Villa conversion at Prestelandet

VCP movementThe semi detached house from the late 50s, with a combined concrete and wooden construction, has a split level layout that opens the house up visibly between the dining and living areas. The vertical movement in the void between the levels create the necessary distance to achieve an open and airy feel. The existing materials are a mix that at times contradict and blur the spatial clarity of the split-level solution, and thereby interfere with the spatial experience.

VCP materialsThe main ambition is to retain as many of the qualities of the original building as possible. The window solutions, door nobs, carpentry interiors are all characteristic for the period, and are kept and restored. The windows are also restored, but given new glass with better energy performance within the existing frames. The only two major renovations of the house are the kitchen and the bathroom – both given a contemporary esthetics and a more functional layout in tune with the clients needs.

The vertical movement is articulated by the floor surfaces and carpentry detailing. The surfaces are redefined – the void is articulated and opened up to include movement to the basement. The floor surface materials indicate the public movement through the house, with clear changes in material to the private zones of the house on both floors.

VCP area plan red2The movement into and through the house on the ground floor is articulated stronger and brighter, connecting the entrance with a patio at the garden side of the house. The garden is redone with a new garden gate / shed as the backdrop. The asymmetric path to the garden entrance shifts the direction of the garden, dividing it in an apple orchard and lawn for play and games.

Summer house extension at Høysand

CCH birdseye 2The summer house bridges the landscape on a hillside, overlooking the water and the surrounding archipelago at Høysand in Skjeberg, Østfold. The original summer house has gradually been extended with terraces and a new adjacent annex to form a complex composition.

CCH sectionBy binding the annex and the main house together with a transparent roof, the bedrooms are tied together with the living areas through a sheltered semi-climatized passage. By enlarging the annex with one more bedroom, and removing the bedroom from the main house, the living areas are enlarged, and a more functional overall layout is achieved.

CCH birdseye 1The small changes bring seasonally independent functionality, while the design keep the original elements of the composition intact. Added elements like canopies and windscreens are given a uniform design in contrast to the closed main building and annex.

Summer house conversion at Kråkerøy

CK_southwestAn existing summer house, consisting of two equally large parts (nicknamed «the old hut» and «the new hut»), need only slight transformation to enhance its functionality and spatial experience.

CK_plan sh2Originally the two parts are linked only by an outdoor connection over the terrace, the entrance is cramped, and there are no proper sanitary facilities in the summer house. The connections between inside and outside is limited to small double doors towards the terrace.

CK_birdseye 2As sanitary services have been supplied for this summer housing area, a new bathroom is installed as a warm core of «the new hut». Access between bedrooms and the living areas is through a new internal passage, which enhance seasonal usability. Two new spacious bedrooms also comes as a consequence of the changed layout and added bathroom.

CK_northeastNew main entrance to «the old hut» is placed directly from the entrance terrace, and a more generous opening towards the afternoon terrace makes free flowing movement through the summer house and around its core.

Motto 09975 Jellinge

J_perspective1In Jelling the Danish history is visible layer by layer of continuous activity, all the way back to the earliest of days – some layers still intact while others transformed, reused or moved and others still completely removed. In the community planning these elements are looked upon as references and for inspiration – Jellinge is a place of dynamic development and not the status quo.

J_plansThe rocks are in fact just blocks of granite – its the carved signs on them that give the symbolic value far greater than the mere impression of them. They occupy both a greater physical and metaphysical space – their stories of the place, the people and the land. The aura of the rocks is charged with symbols that will bring wonder and enthusiasm to generations to come – it would be unique and bind together the history with the present and point towards the future. The aura, with its artistic expression, places a new layer on top of the already existing ones and hint towards the past use of colour to enhance the stones´ message. It plays with the changing light of the different seasons.

J_perspective2-2The smallest rock, which is not in its original position, is in great danger of deteriorating. The archeological advice is therefore to bring it inside a climatized building to prevent further deterioration. The bigger rock, in better condition, is placed under a glass canopy, naturally ventilated but weather protected. These are the simplest measures to provide the necessary protection while still keep the integrity of the monument site.

J_sectionsAll sides of the stone areclearly visible, and you can get in close to see the detail. The climatized screen protects against contact and vandalism. The screen is open and naturally ventilated so that there will be no condensation problems. Rainwater is handled through the construction foundation ring that runs along the glass canopy sides. The entire screen is produced off-site and lifted in place in one move, thus removing danger from operation processes on site close to the stones.

J_perspective3Throughout the development of the concept the main focus has been to reduce the CO2-emissions as much as possible. From critically evaluating the actual needs, through form- and construction optimalization, material / reuseability / lifecycle evaluations and product optimalization to energy supply and efficient lighting, the goal has been continuous monitoring and reducing the CO2 footprint. As the diagram shows, a significant reduction can be reached by making the right choices.

J_CO2footprint2

Motto 58845 Árnastofnun

arnarstofnun1_1024In june 2008 we submitted a proposal for a new university campus building in Reykjavík, gathering all Icelandic competence researching and educating in the historic Icelandic litterature and better facilities for displaying the original Saga manuscripts in one building. Needless to say, the building would be of national importance and a great many architectural offices took part. We collaborated with Geir, Jarl Ture and Espen (Griff Arkitektur), as well as brainstorming at the beginning with Odd and Adnan (a-lab).

arnarstofnun3_1024The building is divided into three distinctive parts – Álfaborgin (the elf city);the rock you enter into where the national treasure is kept safe – jarðskorpan (the crust); the rough icelandic landscape where you move freely on top, and «bókin» (the book); hovering over the violent landscape, elevated, containing and protecting the knowledge.

arnarstofnun2-2_1024We got shortlisted in the evaluation, one of 5 potential contenders to the 1. prize. Among the jury comments were «…. The floor plans of the lower floors are skillfully done with beautiful horizontal and vertical spatial connections. The idea of the connection between the storage facilities and the exposition area is particularly interesting…,… the library and exhibition spaces are interestingly designed and the overall appearance is exciting and positive, material choices are innovative»

Motto 53468 MuDeSa

mudesa1_1024On the 9th of April 2008 we went to Garðabær to pick up the 3rd prize for our proposal for the new Museum of Design an Applied Arts (Mudesa). There were 35 competition entries.

mudesa4_1024Visiting the museum would be a unique spatial experience – the museum opens up towards the square with its spiralling shape and invites the visitors in, as well as exposes its contents outwards and contributes to a lively town center square. The strength of the proposal is the way it weaves outside and inside together, and the multistorey central exposition space which connects all levels of the building.

mudesa2-2_1024Among the jury comments were » Convincing solution. Ambitious proposal, effortless in its simplicitiy without being neutral….Internal spaces are intertwined in an amusing way with good visual connections….The proposal contains brilliant solutions and interesting spaces of varying size and shape.»

mudesa3_1024The winning proposal was made by PK Arkitektar, one of the leading architectural offices in Iceland.